Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Australian adolescents’ knowledge of smoking harms and misperceptions about tobacco products: a cross-sectional study
  1. Maree Scully1,
  2. Melanie A Wakefield1,2,
  3. Emily Baker1,
  4. Ian Koh1,
  5. Michelle Scollo1,
  6. Emily Brennan1,2,
  7. Victoria M White3,
  8. Sarah J Durkin1,2
  1. 1 Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2 Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3 School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Maree Scully; Maree.Scully{at}cancervic.org.au

Abstract

Objective To assess adolescents’ baseline knowledge of smoking health harms scheduled to be covered in future graphic health warnings (GHWs) and inform the content of future tobacco control public communication campaigns.

Methods Cross-sectional survey of 8631 secondary school students (mean age=14.5 years) in Australia in 2022/2023 (weighted n=8655). Students were asked (a) for their agreement/disagreement that smoking causes each of nine harms (eg, lung cancer, stomach cancer and asthma), (b) to indicate where most of smoking’s harmful chemicals come from and (c) for their agreement/disagreement concerning the relative harmfulness of different tobacco product attributes (eg, menthol and roll-your-own). Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between students’ knowledge and perceptions and their smoking status, controlling for demographics and school-level clustering.

Results Students had greater awareness of harms previously publicised in Australia. Among students who had never smoked, those open to future smoking had lower awareness of six smoking harms than those with a firm future intention not to smoke. Only 17.8% of all students were aware that most harmful chemicals came from burning the tobacco, with 37.8% not knowing and 34.6% attributing the source to additives. Three-quarters held misperceptions that roll-your-own cigarettes are less harmful than factory-made cigarettes or that cigarette smoke which feels light or smooth is less harmful than smoke that feels harsh. Only 25.9% of students were aware that menthol cigarettes are more addictive than non-menthol cigarettes.

Discussion New GHWs and public communication campaigns could improve student knowledge of previously unpublicised smoking harms and counter pervasive misperceptions about tobacco products.

  • Awareness
  • Public policy
  • Prevention

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors MAW, MScu, MSco and EBr conceptualised the study. MScu and EBa managed the data collection, with oversight from MAW and SJD. IK, MScu and EBa undertook data cleaning, and MScu conducted the data analysis. MAW wrote the initial draft, with all authors involved in interpretation of the data and editing and reviewing the paper. MScu is the guarantor.

  • Funding This work was supported by the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care and State and Territory Governments of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania, the Northern Territory and the ACT, as well as Cancer Councils in Victoria, South Australia, Queensland and Tasmania and the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute.

  • Competing interests All authors are employed by (MScu, EBa, IK, MSco, EBr and SJD) or hold an honorary position with (MAW and VMW), Cancer Council Victoria, a non-profit organisation that conducts research and advocacy aimed at reducing the harms of tobacco in the community, especially those pertaining to cancer. MAW, EBr and SJD have received grants for research on the development and testing of health warnings to correct tobacco product misperceptions (National Health and Medical Research Council Project grant #1142981) and to test the effectiveness of messages about tobacco product bans (Australian Prevention Partnership Centre grant). MSco has received funding from VicHealth and State Cancer Councils for work on publication of Tobacco in Australia: Facts and Issues. SJD and EBr are current board members of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco—Oceania Chapter, and MSco is a current member of Cancer Council Australia’s Tobacco Issues Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.